ANZCTR is currently experiencing a technical issue. Thank you for your patience while we work on it and apologies for any inconvenience caused.


Reset your password and enable multi-factor authentication (MFA)


For ANZCTR account holders: to help ensure the cyber safety of your account, you’ll need to reset your password and set-up multi-factor authentication (MFA) as per the instructions below.


  1. Go to the Login page, click ‘reset password’ and follow the instructions.
  2. Check your email for the link to set a new password.
  3. Create a new password that meets requirements.
  4. Return to the Login page and enter your new password. A verification code will be sent to your email.
  5. Check your email for the code and enter it on the Login page. If the code is entered incorrectly, you can re-enter the correct one or request a new one.

Learn more about MFA and its importance on the Australian Signals Directorate website.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03256344




Registration number
NCT03256344
Ethics application status
Date submitted
8/08/2017
Date registered
22/08/2017
Date last updated
14/05/2024

Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Talimogene Laherparepvec With Atezolizumab for Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases
Scientific title
A Phase 1b Study of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Atezolizumab in Subjects With Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
20140299
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer 0 0
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Breast
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Bowel - Back passage (rectum) or large bowel (colon)

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Other - Talimogene Laherparepvec
Treatment: Other - Atezolizumab

Experimental: Talimogene Laherparepvec with Atezolizumab: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) - Participants with TNBC with liver metastases administered intrahepatic injection of talimogene laherparepvec into liver metastases via guided injection (either ultrasound or computerized tomography) on Day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of 12 cycles, where each cycle is 21 days. Participants administered 10\^6 plaque-forming units/milliliter (PFU/mL) on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 10\^8 PFU/mL on Day 1 of each cycle thereafter. Participants also administered 1200 mg atezolizumab via intravenous injection on Day 1 of each cycle.

Experimental: Talimogene Laherparepvec with Atezolizumab: Colorectal Cancer (CRC) - Participants with CRC with liver metastases administered intrahepatic injection of talimogene laherparepvec into liver metastases via guided injection (either ultrasound or computerized tomography) on Day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of 12 cycles, where each cycle is 21 days. Participants administered 10\^6 PFU/mL on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 10\^8 PFU/mL on Day 1 of each cycle thereafter. Participants also administered 1200 mg atezolizumab via intravenous injection on Day 1 of each cycle.


Treatment: Other: Talimogene Laherparepvec
Virally based anti-cancer immunotherapy given by direct injection into tumors.

Treatment: Other: Atezolizumab
A monoclonal antibody given by intravenous injection.

Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Other
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
Assessment method [1] 0 0
Toxicities were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. A DLT was considered as any of the below, if judged by the investigator to be related to either treatment: * Grade = 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] \< 500/µl) lasting = 7 days * Grade = 3 febrile neutropenia * Grade = 4 thrombocytopenia * Grade = 4 anemia * Grade = 4 rash * Serious herpetic events * Grade = 3 symptomatic hepatic toxicities that do not resolve to Grade = 2 within 48 hours or Grade = 3 asymptomatic hepatic toxicities that do not resolve to Grade = 1 within 3 weeks of onset * Grade = 3 non-hematologic, non-hepatic organ toxicity * Grade 5 toxicity (ie, death) * Any other intolerable toxicity leading to permanent discontinuation of treatment DLTs were to occur within the DLT evaluation period, defined as the period between the initial 10\^6 PFU/mL dose and 3 weeks following the initial 10\^8 PFU/mL dose or the start of Cycle 3, whichever occurred first.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
From Day 1 up to the start of Cycle 3 (each cycle is 21 days)
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Assessment method [1] 0 0
ORR was defined as the incidence rate of either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on modified immune-related response criteria simulating Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(irRC-RECIST) criteria. A CR was a complete disappearance of all lesions and a PR was a decrease in tumor burden 30% or more relative to baseline.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Every 12 weeks (± 28 days) up to approximately 3.5 years.
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Assessment method [2] 0 0
BOR was defined as the best visit response based on modified irRC-RECIST criteria: * CR: a complete disappearance of all lesions * PR: a decrease in tumor burden 30% or more relative to baseline * Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD) * PD: an increase in tumor burden of 20% or more and at least 5 mm absolute increase relative to nadir (minimum recorded tumor burden) * Unevaluable (UE): any lesion present at baseline which was not assessed or was unable to be evaluated leading to an inability to determine the status of that particular tumor
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Every 12 weeks (± 28 days) up to approximately 3.5 years.
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Duration of Response (DOR)
Assessment method [3] 0 0
DOR was defined as the time from the date of an initial response that is subsequently confirmed to the earlier of PD per modified irRC RECIST or death. Participants who have not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment.
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Every 12 weeks (± 28 days) up to approximately 3.5 years.
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Lesion Level Response in Injected Tumor Lesions
Assessment method [4] 0 0
Responses for individual tumor lesions for hepatic and non-hepatic tumors injected wtih treatment were assessed for the following responses: * Lesion complete response rate (L-CRR): Disappearance of lesion * Lesion partial response rate (L-PRR): Decrease in tumor burden 30% or more relative to baseline * Lesion objective response rate (L-ORR): Either a L-CRR or L-PRR based on modified irRC-RECIST criteria
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Every 12 weeks (± 28 days) up to approximately 3.5 years.
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Lesion Level Response in Uninjected Tumor Lesions
Assessment method [5] 0 0
Responses for individual tumor lesions for hepatic and non-hepatic tumors that were not injected with treatment were assessed for the following responses: * L-CRR: Disappearance of lesion * L-PRR: Decrease in tumor burden 30% or more relative to baseline * L-ORR: Either a L-CRR or L-PRR based on modified irRC-RECIST criteria
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Every 12 weeks (± 28 days) up to approximately 3.5 years.
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Durable Response Rate (DRR)
Assessment method [6] 0 0
DRR was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective response with a DOR of at least 6 months.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
Every 12 weeks (± 28 days) up to approximately 3.5 years.
Secondary outcome [7] 0 0
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Assessment method [7] 0 0
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants that have a best overall response in one of the following categories: CR/PR/SD.
Timepoint [7] 0 0
Every 12 weeks (± 28 days) up to approximately 3.5 years.
Secondary outcome [8] 0 0
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Assessment method [8] 0 0
PFS was defined as time from first dose to the date of first of confirmed disease progression per modified irRC-RECIST criteria, or death (whichever occurred first). Results were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Timepoint [8] 0 0
Every 12 weeks (± 28 days) up to approximately 3.5 years.
Secondary outcome [9] 0 0
Overall Survival (OS)
Assessment method [9] 0 0
OS was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of death from any cause. Results were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Timepoint [9] 0 0
Every 12 weeks (± 28 days) up to approximately 3.5 years.

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Criteria1, Participant provided informed consent prior to any study-specific activities/procedures.
* Criteria 2, Confirmation of triple negative breast cancer or colorectal cancer with liver metastases by laboratory testing.
* Criteria 3, Subjects with triple negative breast cancer with liver metastases, or subjects with colorectal cancer with liver metastases are eligible if they have had disease progression during or after one or more prior standard of care systemic anti-cancer therapy (eg,chemotherapy, targeted therapy) for metastatic disease or if they progress during or within 6 months of receiving adjuvant therapy. If subjects, in the opinion of the investigator, are deemed not appropriate candidates for systemic anti-cancer therapy for metastatic disease or if they refuse systemic anti-cancer therapy for metastatic disease, they may be eligible after investigator discussion with Sponsor medical monitor for approval.
* Criteria 4, Participants have measurable disease which is equal to one or more metastatic liver lesions that can be accurately and serially measured that are greater than or equal to 1 cm dimension and for which the longest diameter is greater or equal to 1 cm as measured by CT (Computed Tomography) scan or magnetic resonance imaging. The metastatic liver lesion(s) must not be in an area that received prior localized therapies.
* Criteria 5, Metastatic liver lesions for injection must be without necrosis (dead tissue )and must be be located where any tumor swelling will not lead to gall bladder tract obstruction or lead to bleeding risk.
* Criteria 6, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0 or 1.
* Criteria 7, Life expectancy greater than or equal to 5 months.
* Criteria 8, Adequate organ function within 4 weeks prior to enrollment. This includes hematology, renal, hepatic and blood-clotting functions as defined by protocol.
* Criteria 9, Female subjects of childbearing potential should have a negative serum pregnancy test within 1 week prior to enrollment.
* Criteria 10, Other Inclusion Criteria May Apply.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
99 Years
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria:

* Criteria 1, Participant is a candidate for hepatic surgery or local regional therapy of liver metastases with curative intent.
* Criteria 2, More than one third of the liver is estimated to be involved with metastases.
* Criteria 3, There is invasion by cancer into the main blood vessels such as the portal vein, hepatic vein or the vena cava.
* Criteria 4, Participant is currently receiving or has received liver metastatic-directed therapy ( eg: radiation, ablation, embolization) less than 4 wks prior to enrollment or hepatic surgery.
* Criteria 5, History of other malignancy within the past 5 years prior to enrollment with some exceptions, as outlined in the protocol.
* Criteria 6, Active or untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases per CT or magnetic resonance imagine (MRI) evaluation during screening.
* Participants with a history of CNS metastases are eligible provided they are stable and meet the criteria details in the protocol.
* Criteria 7, Other Medical Conditions as noted in the protocol.
* Criteria 8, Other Exclusion Criteria May Apply.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Other
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Single group
Other design features
Phase
Phase 1
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC,WA
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Liverpool Hospital - Liverpool
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
Monash Medical Centre - Clayton
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
Fiona Stanley Hospital - Murdoch
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
Breast Cancer Research Centre - WA - Nedlands
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2170 - Liverpool
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
3168 - Clayton
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
6150 - Murdoch
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
6009 - Nedlands
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
California
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
New York
Country [3] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [3] 0 0
Bruxelles
Country [4] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [4] 0 0
Gent
Country [5] 0 0
Germany
State/province [5] 0 0
Berlin
Country [6] 0 0
Germany
State/province [6] 0 0
Bonn
Country [7] 0 0
Germany
State/province [7] 0 0
Tübingen
Country [8] 0 0
Spain
State/province [8] 0 0
Cataluña
Country [9] 0 0
Spain
State/province [9] 0 0
Madrid
Country [10] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [10] 0 0
Bern
Country [11] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [11] 0 0
Geneva 14

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Amgen
Country
Other collaborator category [1] 0 0
Commercial sector/industry
Name [1] 0 0
Roche-Genentech
Country [1] 0 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
MD
Address 0 0
Amgen
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

Data sharing statement


What supporting documents are/will be available?

Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.