Trial Review

Reset your password and enable multi-factor authentication (MFA)


For ANZCTR account holders: to help ensure the cyber safety of your account, you’ll need to reset your password and set-up multi-factor authentication (MFA) as per the instructions below.


  1. Go to the Login page, click ‘reset password’ and follow the instructions.
  2. Check your email for the link to set a new password.
  3. Create a new password that meets requirements.
  4. Return to the Login page and enter your new password. A verification code will be sent to your email.
  5. Check your email for the code and enter it on the Login page. If the code is entered incorrectly, you can re-enter the correct one or request a new one.

Learn more about MFA and its importance on the Australian Signals Directorate website.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03334422




Registration number
NCT03334422
Ethics application status
Date submitted
3/11/2017
Date registered
7/11/2017
Date last updated
22/01/2020

Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Scientific title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
I4V-MC-JAHM
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
16581
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
BREEZE-AD2
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Atopic Dermatitis 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Skin 0 0 0 0
Dermatological conditions
Skin 0 0 0 0
Other skin conditions
Inflammatory and Immune System 0 0 0 0
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Baricitinib
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo

Experimental: 4 Milligram (mg) Baricitinib - 4mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. Placebo 1 mg and 2 mg administered orally every day to match

Experimental: 2mg Baricitinib - 2mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. Placebo 1 mg and 4 mg administered orally every day to match.

Experimental: 1mg Baricitinib - 1mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. Placebo 2 mg and 4 mg administered orally every day to match.

Placebo comparator: Placebo - Placebo administered orally once daily.


Treatment: Drugs: Baricitinib
Administered orally

Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Administered orally
Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 With a = 2 Point Improvement (Placebo, 2mg and 4mg Baricitinib)
Assessment method [1] 0 0
The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participants overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0 or 1 With a = 2 Point Improvement (Placebo, 1mg Baricitinib)
Assessment method [1] 0 0
The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participants overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75)
Assessment method [2] 0 0
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score is obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI75 is defined as a = 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI90
Assessment method [3] 0 0
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100%) and the severity of 4 clinical signs (1) erythema, (2)edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score is obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI90 is defined as a = 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.
Timepoint [3] 0 0
16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Percent Change From Baseline on EASI Score
Assessment method [4] 0 0
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of AD - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs (1) erythema (2)edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score is obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). Least Square (LS) Means were calculated using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD75)
Assessment method [5] 0 0
The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable Itching or lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7\*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. The SCORAD75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a = 75% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score.
Timepoint [5] 0 0
16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 4-Point Improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Assessment method [6] 0 0
The Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participants itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [7] 0 0
Change From Baseline in the Score of Item 2 of the Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale (ADSS)
Assessment method [7] 0 0
Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale (ADSS) is a 3-item, participant-administered questionnaire developed to assess the impact of itch on sleep including difficulty falling asleep, frequency of waking, and difficulty getting back to sleep last night. Item 2, frequency of waking last night is reported by selecting the number of times they woke up each night, ranging from 0 to 29 times, where the higher a number indicates a worse outcome. The ADSS is designed to be completed daily, using a daily diary, with respondents thinking about sleep "last night." Each item is scored individually. LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by- visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [7] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [8] 0 0
Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS
Assessment method [8] 0 0
Skin Pain NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "worst pain imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's skin pain is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of skin pain in the past 24 hours. LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [8] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [9] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI50
Assessment method [9] 0 0
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs (1) erythema, (2)edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI 50 is defined as =50% improvement from baseline in EASI score.
Timepoint [9] 0 0
16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [10] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0
Assessment method [10] 0 0
The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participants overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Timepoint [10] 0 0
16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [11] 0 0
Change From Baseline in SCORAD
Assessment method [11] 0 0
The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7\*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. LSMeans was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, \& treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [11] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [12] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD90
Assessment method [12] 0 0
The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7\*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. SCORAD90 defined as a = 90% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score.
Timepoint [12] 0 0
16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [13] 0 0
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected
Assessment method [13] 0 0
Body surface area affected by AD will be assessed for 4 separate body regions and is collected as part of the EASI assessment: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region will be assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. The overall total percentage will be reported based off of all 4 body regions combined, after applying specific multipliers to the different body regions to account for the percent of the total BSA represented by each of the 4 regions. Use the percentage of skin affected for each region (0 to 100%) in EASI as follows: BSA Total = 0.1\*BSAhead and neck + 0.3\*BSAtrunk + 0.2\* BSAupper limbs + 0.4\*BSAlower limbs. LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [13] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [14] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Developing Skin Infections Requiring Antibiotic Treatment
Assessment method [14] 0 0
Percentage of participants developing skin infections requiring antibiotic treatment.
Timepoint [14] 0 0
16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [15] 0 0
Percent Change From Baseline in Itch NRS
Assessment method [15] 0 0
The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, \& treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [15] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [16] 0 0
Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)
Assessment method [16] 0 0
The POEM is a 7-item self-assessment questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) on a scale ranging from 0-4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days, 4 = everyday). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). High scores are indicative of more severe disease and poor quality of life. LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, \& treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [16] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [17] 0 0
Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Severity-Atopic Dermatitis (PGI-S-AD) Score
Assessment method [17] 0 0
The PGI-S-AD asked the participant to evaluate the severity of the disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale, using a daily diary. The same category labels used in the Physician's Global Assessment were used for the PGI-S-AD, ie, "(0) no symptoms", "(1) very mild", "(2) mild" "(3) moderate", and "(4) severe." LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [17] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [18] 0 0
Change From Baseline on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Assessment method [18] 0 0
The HADS is a participant-rated instrument used to assess both anxiety and depression. This instrument consists of 14 items questionnaire, each item is rated on a 4-point scale, giving maximum scores of 21 for anxiety and depression. Scores of 11 or more on either subscale are considered to be a significant 'case' of psychological morbidity, while scores of 8-10 represent 'borderline' and 0-7, 'normal. LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, \& treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [18] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [19] 0 0
Change From Baseline on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Assessment method [19] 0 0
The DLQI is a simple, participant-administered, 10 question, validated, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. The recall period of this scale is over the last "week." Response categories include "not at all," "a lot," and "very much," with corresponding scores of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and unanswered ("not relevant") responses scored as "0." Scores range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment), and a 4-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, \& treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [19] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [20] 0 0
Change From Baseline on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Atopic Dermatitis (WPAI-AD) Questionnaire
Assessment method [20] 0 0
The WPAI-AD participant questionnaire was developed to measure the effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities in the 7 days prior to the visit. The WPAI-AD consists of 6 items grouped in 4 domains: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and activity impairment, that range from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating greater impairment. LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, \& treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [20] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [21] 0 0
Change From Baseline on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score United States and United Kingdom Algorithm
Assessment method [21] 0 0
EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The first part is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1, and the United States (US) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.109 to 1. A higher score indicates better health state. LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, \& treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [21] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [22] 0 0
Change From Baseline on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Score (VAS)
Assessment method [22] 0 0
EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The second part is assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine. LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, \& treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Timepoint [22] 0 0
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary outcome [23] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 With a = 2 Point Improvement
Assessment method [23] 0 0
The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participants overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Timepoint [23] 0 0
4 Weeks

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Have been diagnosed with moderate to severe Atopic Dermatitis for at least 12 months.
* Have had inadequate response or intolerance to existing topical (applied to the skin) medications within 6 months preceding screening.
* Are willing to discontinue certain treatments for eczema (such as systemic and topical treatments during a washout period).
* Agree to use emollients daily.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Are currently experiencing or have a history of other concomitant skin conditions (e.g., psoriasis or lupus erythematosus), or a history of erythrodermic, refractory, or unstable skin disease that requires frequent hospitalizations and/or intravenous treatment for skin infections.
* A history of eczema herpeticum within 12 months, and/or a history of 2 or more episode of eczema herpeticum in the past.
* Participants who are currently experiencing a skin infection that requires treatment, or is currently being treated, with topical or systemic antibiotics.
* Have any serious illness that is anticipated to require the use of systemic corticosteroids or otherwise interfere with study participation or require active frequent monitoring (e.g., unstable chronic asthma).
* Have been treated with the following therapies:

* Monoclonal antibody for less than 5 half-lives prior to randomization.
* Received prior treatment with any oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor.
* Received any parenteral corticosteroids administered by intramuscular or intravenous (IV) injection within 2 weeks prior to study entry or within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization or are anticipated to require parenteral injection of corticosteroids during the study.
* Have had an intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 2 weeks prior to study entry or within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization.
* Have high blood pressure characterized by a repeated systolic blood pressure >160 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg.
* Have had major surgery within the past eight weeks or are planning major surgery during the study.
* Have experienced any of the following within 12 weeks of screening: venous thromboembolic event (VTE), myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, stroke, or New York Heart Association Stage III/IV heart failure.
* Have a history of recurrent (= 2) VTE or are considered at high risk of VTE as deemed by the investigator.
* Have a history or presence of cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, chronic liver disease gastrointestinal, endocrine, hematological, neurological, lymphoproliferative disease or neuropsychiatric disorders or any other serious and/or unstable illness.
* Have a current or recent clinically serious viral, bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infection including herpes zoster, tuberculosis.
* Have specific laboratory abnormalities.
* Have received certain treatments that are contraindicated.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s


The people analysing the results/data
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
27/11/2017
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
12/12/2018
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
615
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,QLD,SA,VIC,WA
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Woden Dermatology - Phillip
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
Skin & Cancer Foundation Australia - Westmead
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
Veracity Clinical Research Pty Ltd - Woolloongabba
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
Clinical Trials SA Pty Ltd - Adelaide
Recruitment hospital [5] 0 0
Skin and Cancer Foundation Inc. - Carlton
Recruitment hospital [6] 0 0
Fremantle Dermatology - Perth
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2606 - Phillip
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
2145 - Westmead
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
4102 - Woolloongabba
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
5073 - Adelaide
Recruitment postcode(s) [5] 0 0
3053 - Carlton
Recruitment postcode(s) [6] 0 0
6160 - Perth
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
Argentina
State/province [1] 0 0
Buenos Aires
Country [2] 0 0
Argentina
State/province [2] 0 0
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Country [3] 0 0
Argentina
State/province [3] 0 0
Mendoza
Country [4] 0 0
Austria
State/province [4] 0 0
Oberösterreich
Country [5] 0 0
Austria
State/province [5] 0 0
Wien
Country [6] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [6] 0 0
Csongrad
Country [7] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [7] 0 0
Hajdu-Bihar
Country [8] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [8] 0 0
Jasz-Nagykun-Szolnok
Country [9] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [9] 0 0
Budapest
Country [10] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [10] 0 0
Kaposvar
Country [11] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [11] 0 0
Oroshaza
Country [12] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [12] 0 0
Szombathely
Country [13] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [13] 0 0
Veszprem
Country [14] 0 0
Israel
State/province [14] 0 0
Afula
Country [15] 0 0
Israel
State/province [15] 0 0
Haifa
Country [16] 0 0
Israel
State/province [16] 0 0
Jerusalem
Country [17] 0 0
Israel
State/province [17] 0 0
Petach Tikva
Country [18] 0 0
Israel
State/province [18] 0 0
Ramat Gan
Country [19] 0 0
Israel
State/province [19] 0 0
Tel Aviv
Country [20] 0 0
Japan
State/province [20] 0 0
Chiba
Country [21] 0 0
Japan
State/province [21] 0 0
Fukuoka
Country [22] 0 0
Japan
State/province [22] 0 0
Hokkaido
Country [23] 0 0
Japan
State/province [23] 0 0
Ibaraki
Country [24] 0 0
Japan
State/province [24] 0 0
Kanagawa
Country [25] 0 0
Japan
State/province [25] 0 0
Kumamoto
Country [26] 0 0
Japan
State/province [26] 0 0
Osaka
Country [27] 0 0
Japan
State/province [27] 0 0
Saitama
Country [28] 0 0
Japan
State/province [28] 0 0
Tochigi
Country [29] 0 0
Japan
State/province [29] 0 0
Tokyo
Country [30] 0 0
Japan
State/province [30] 0 0
Gifu
Country [31] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [31] 0 0
Gyeonggi Do
Country [32] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [32] 0 0
Korea
Country [33] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [33] 0 0
Seoul
Country [34] 0 0
Poland
State/province [34] 0 0
Bialystok
Country [35] 0 0
Poland
State/province [35] 0 0
Gdansk
Country [36] 0 0
Poland
State/province [36] 0 0
Katowice
Country [37] 0 0
Poland
State/province [37] 0 0
Krakow
Country [38] 0 0
Poland
State/province [38] 0 0
Lodz
Country [39] 0 0
Poland
State/province [39] 0 0
Olsztyn
Country [40] 0 0
Poland
State/province [40] 0 0
Osielsko
Country [41] 0 0
Poland
State/province [41] 0 0
Szczecin
Country [42] 0 0
Poland
State/province [42] 0 0
Warsaw
Country [43] 0 0
Poland
State/province [43] 0 0
Warszawa
Country [44] 0 0
Spain
State/province [44] 0 0
Badalona
Country [45] 0 0
Spain
State/province [45] 0 0
Madrid
Country [46] 0 0
Spain
State/province [46] 0 0
Navarra
Country [47] 0 0
Spain
State/province [47] 0 0
Alicante
Country [48] 0 0
Spain
State/province [48] 0 0
Pontevedra
Country [49] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [49] 0 0
Vaud
Country [50] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [50] 0 0
Bern
Country [51] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [51] 0 0
Genève
Country [52] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [52] 0 0
Zürich

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Eli Lilly and Company
Country
Other collaborator category [1] 0 0
Commercial sector/industry
Name [1] 0 0
Incyte Corporation
Country [1] 0 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)
Address 0 0
Eli Lilly and Company
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

Data sharing statement


What supporting documents are/will be available?



Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Results are available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03334422