Reset your password and enable multi-factor authentication (MFA)


For ANZCTR account holders: to help ensure the cyber safety of your account, you’ll need to reset your password and set-up multi-factor authentication (MFA) as per the instructions below.


  1. Go to the Login page, click ‘reset password’ and follow the instructions.
  2. Check your email for the link to set a new password.
  3. Create a new password that meets requirements. New passwords must include at least one lowercase letter, one uppercase letter, one number and one special character (e.g. !#$%&@).
  4. Return to the Login page and enter your new password. A verification code will be sent to your email.
  5. Check your email for the code and enter it on the Login page. If the code is entered incorrectly, you can re-enter the correct one or request a new one.

Learn more about MFA and its importance on the Australian Signals Directorate website.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02891226




Registration number
NCT02891226
Ethics application status
Date submitted
1/09/2016
Date registered
7/09/2016
Date last updated
30/08/2022

Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of Mirikizumab (LY3074828) in Participants With Active Crohn's Disease
Scientific title
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Arm, Placebo-Controlled Study of LY3074828 in Subjects With Active Crohn's Disease (SERENITY)
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
I6T-MC-AMAG
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
16492
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
SERENITY
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Crohn's Disease 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Oral and Gastrointestinal 0 0 0 0
Inflammatory bowel disease
Inflammatory and Immune System 0 0 0 0
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Oral and Gastrointestinal 0 0 0 0
Crohn's disease

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Experimental: Mirikizumab - Period 1 (Weeks 0 -12): 200 Milligram (mg), 600 mg, and 1000 mg mirikizumab administered intravenously (IV) every 4 Weeks (Q4W).

Period 2 (Weeks 12 - 52): 200 mg, 600 mg, and 1000 mg mirikizumab administered IV Q4W; 300 mg mirikizumab administered subcutaneously (SC) Q4W; 1000 mg mirikizumab administered IV Q4W for non-improvers in period 1; and 1000 mg mirikizumab administered IV Q4W for participants on placebo during period 1.

Period 3 (Weeks 52 - 208): 300 mg mirikizumab administered SC Q4W.

Placebo comparator: Placebo - Period 1 (Weeks 0 -12): Participants received placebo administered intravenously (IV) Q4W.

Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 12
Assessment method [1] 0 0
Endoscopic response defined as = 50% reduction from baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) at Week 12. The SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables: presence and size of ulcers, proportion of surface covered by ulcers, proportion of surface affected by disease, and presence and severity of stenosis. The total SES-CD calculated as sum of 4 variables for 5 bowel segments: (ileum;right,transverse,and left colon;and rectum): presence and size of ulcers (none = score 0; diameter 0.1-0.5 cm = score 1; 0.5-2 cm = score 2; \>2 cm = score 3); extent of ulcerated surface (none = 0; \<10% = 1;10-30% = 2;\>30% = 3);extent of affected surface (none = 0; \<50% = 1;50-75% = 2;\>75% =3); and presence and type of narrowings (none=0; single, can be passed=1; multiple,can be passed=2; cannot be passed=3). Total SES-CD scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Week 12
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Week 12
Assessment method [1] 0 0
Endoscopic remission defined as SES-CD of \<4 ileal-colonic or \<2 for isolated ileal disease, and no subscore \>1 at week 12. The SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables: presence and size of ulcers, proportion of surface covered by ulcers, proportion of surface affected by disease, and presence and severity of stenosis. The total SES-CD is calculated as the sum of the 4 variables for the 5 bowel segments: (ileum; right, transverse, and left colon; and rectum): presence and size of ulcers (none = score 0; diameter 0.1-0.5 cm = score 1; 0.5-2 cm = score 2; greater than (\>) 2 cm = score 3); extent of ulcerated surface (none = 0; less than (\<) 10% = 1; 10-30% = 2; \>30% = 3); extent of affected surface (none = 0; \<50% = 1; 50-75% = 2; \>75% = 3); and presence and type of narrowings (none=0; single, can be passed=1; multiple, can be passed=2; cannot be passed=3). Total SES-CD scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Week 12
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient Reported Outcome Remission at Week 12
Assessment method [2] 0 0
PRO remission is defined as stool frequency (SF) =2.5 and abdominal pain (AP) =1 and no worse than baseline at week 12. SF captures the number of liquid or very soft stools. AP score is classified as 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Week 12
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Mean Change From Baseline on the Patient Global Rating - Severity (PGRS) Crohn's Disease Score at Week 12
Assessment method [3] 0 0
The PGRS is a 1-item patient-rated questionnaire designed to assess the participant's rating of their disease symptom severity over the past 24 hours. Responses are graded on a 6-point scale in which a score of 1 indicates the subject has no symptoms (that is, "none") and a score of 6 indicates that the participant's symptom are "very severe." Least Squares Mean (LS Mean) was calculated using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with treatment, geographic region, geographic region, prior biologic CD therapy use (prior biologic experience versus prior biologic naive), baseline score, visit, and the interaction of treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as fixed factors.
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Mean of Patient Global Rating - Change (PGRC) Crohn's Disease Score at Week 12
Assessment method [4] 0 0
The PGRC scale is a patient-rated instrument designed to assess the participant's rating of change in their symptom(s). Responses are graded on a 7-point Likert scale in which a score of 1 indicates that the participant's symptom is "very much better," a score of 4 indicates that the participant's symptom has experienced "no change," and a score of 7 indicates that the participant's symptom is "very much worse."
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Mean Change From Baseline on the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 12
Assessment method [5] 0 0
The IBDQ is a 32-item self-administered questionnaire. The IBDQ has 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms (10 items), systemic symptoms (5 items), emotional function (12 items), and social function (5 items). Responses are graded on a 7-point Likert scale in which 7 denotes "not a problem at all" and 1 denotes "a very severe problem." Scores range from 32 to 224; a higher score indicates a better quality of life. LS Mean was calculated using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with treatment, geographic region, geographic region, prior biologic CD therapy use (prior biologic experience versus prior biologic naive), baseline score, visit, and the interaction of treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as fixed factors.
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Mean Change From Baseline on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 12
Assessment method [6] 0 0
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scale is a13-item, symptom-specific questionnaire that specifically assesses the participant's self-reported severity of fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and functioning. The FACIT-F uses a numeric rating scale of 0-4 associated with a range over "Not at all" to "Very much" for each item to assess fatigue and its impact in the past 7 days. Total scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue. LS Mean was calculated using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with treatment, geographic region, geographic region, prior biologic CD therapy use (prior biologic experience versus prior biologic naive), baseline score, visit, and the interaction of treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as fixed factors.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcome [7] 0 0
Mean Change From Baseline on the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores at Week 12
Assessment method [7] 0 0
The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains:physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). MCS consisted of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. PCS consisted of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. Each domain is scored by summing individual items and transforming scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. LS Mean was calculated using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with treatment, geographic region, geographic region, prior biologic CD therapy use (prior biologic experience versus prior biologic naive), baseline score, visit, and the interaction of treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as fixed factors.
Timepoint [7] 0 0
Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcome [8] 0 0
Population Pharmacokinetics (PopPK): Mean Population Clearance of Mirikizumab
Assessment method [8] 0 0
Population mean (between-subject coefficient variance \[CV %\]) apparent clearance. Clearance is estimated based on concentration data collected in the time frame of 0-208 weeks.
Timepoint [8] 0 0
Week 0, 4, 8: Predose, end of infusion; Week 2; 4; 6; 8, 11-12; 12-13; 16; 20; 24; 28; 36; 44; 52; 60; 68; 76; 84; 92; 104; 108; 112; 120; 128; 136; 144; 156; 164; 172; 180; 188; 196 and 208 weeks post infusion
Secondary outcome [9] 0 0
Population Pharmacokinetics (PopPK): Mean Population Volume of Distribution of Mirikizumab
Assessment method [9] 0 0
Population mean (between-subject coefficient variance \[CV %\]) apparent volume of distribution. Volume of distribution is estimated based on concentration data collected in the time frame of 0-208 weeks.
Timepoint [9] 0 0
Week 0, 4, 8: Predose, end of infusion; Week 2; 4; 6; 8, 11-12; 12-13; 16; 20; 24; 28; 36; 44; 52; 60; 68; 76; 84; 92; 104; 108; 112; 120; 128; 136; 144; 156; 164; 172; 180; 188; 196 and 208 weeks post infusion

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Active Crohn's Disease (CD) as determined by the SES-CD, and participant reported stool frequency and abdominal pain.
* Inadequate response or failure to tolerate at least one of the following: aminosalicylates; budesonide; systemic corticosteroids; immunosuppressants (eg, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or methotrexate); or prior exposure to biologics for the treatment of CD.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
75 Years
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Have complications of CD such as strictures, stenoses, or any other manifestation for which surgery might be indicated, or that could confound the evaluation of efficacy.
* Diagnosis of conditions affecting the digestive tract, such as ulcerative colitis, indeterminate colitis, fistulizing disease, abdominal or perianal abscess, adenomatous colonic polyps not excised, colonic mucosal dysplasia, and short bowel syndrome.
* Have had any kind of bowel resection, diversion, or placement of a stoma within 6 months or any other intra-abdominal surgery within 3 months prior to screening.
* Are unsuitable for inclusion in the study in the opinion of the investigator or sponsor for any reason that may compromise the subject's safety or confound data interpretation.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s


The people analysing the results/data
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 2
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD,SA,VIC
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Princess Alexandra Hospital - Woolloongabba
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
Royal Adelaide Hospital - Adelaide
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
Ballarat Health Services - Base Hospital - Ballarat
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
St Vincents Hospital Melbourne - Fitzroy
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
4102 - Woolloongabba
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
5000 - Adelaide
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
3350 - Ballarat
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
3065 - Fitzroy
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Alabama
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Arizona
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
California
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Colorado
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Connecticut
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Florida
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Georgia
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Indiana
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Kentucky
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Louisiana
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
Maryland
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
Michigan
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
Missouri
Country [15] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [15] 0 0
Nevada
Country [16] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [16] 0 0
New Jersey
Country [17] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [17] 0 0
New York
Country [18] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [18] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [19] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [19] 0 0
Ohio
Country [20] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [20] 0 0
Oklahoma
Country [21] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [21] 0 0
Rhode Island
Country [22] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [22] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [23] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [23] 0 0
Texas
Country [24] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [24] 0 0
Utah
Country [25] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [25] 0 0
Washington
Country [26] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [26] 0 0
Brussel
Country [27] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [27] 0 0
Gent
Country [28] 0 0
Canada
State/province [28] 0 0
Ontario
Country [29] 0 0
Czechia
State/province [29] 0 0
Czech Republic
Country [30] 0 0
Czechia
State/province [30] 0 0
Hradec Kralove
Country [31] 0 0
Czechia
State/province [31] 0 0
Olomouc
Country [32] 0 0
Czechia
State/province [32] 0 0
Praha 4 - Krc
Country [33] 0 0
Czechia
State/province [33] 0 0
Praha 5
Country [34] 0 0
Czechia
State/province [34] 0 0
Zlin
Country [35] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [35] 0 0
Budapest
Country [36] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [36] 0 0
Vac
Country [37] 0 0
Japan
State/province [37] 0 0
Chiba-Ken
Country [38] 0 0
Japan
State/province [38] 0 0
Fukoka
Country [39] 0 0
Japan
State/province [39] 0 0
Fukuoka-Ken
Country [40] 0 0
Japan
State/province [40] 0 0
Hokkaido
Country [41] 0 0
Japan
State/province [41] 0 0
Kagoshima
Country [42] 0 0
Japan
State/province [42] 0 0
Kanagawa
Country [43] 0 0
Japan
State/province [43] 0 0
Miyagi-Ken
Country [44] 0 0
Japan
State/province [44] 0 0
Osaka-Fu
Country [45] 0 0
Japan
State/province [45] 0 0
Tokyo
Country [46] 0 0
Japan
State/province [46] 0 0
Toyama
Country [47] 0 0
Japan
State/province [47] 0 0
Fukuoka
Country [48] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [48] 0 0
Noord Brabant
Country [49] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [49] 0 0
Amsterdam
Country [50] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [50] 0 0
Nijmegen
Country [51] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [51] 0 0
Rotterdam
Country [52] 0 0
Poland
State/province [52] 0 0
Bydgoszcz
Country [53] 0 0
Poland
State/province [53] 0 0
Lublin
Country [54] 0 0
Poland
State/province [54] 0 0
Poznan
Country [55] 0 0
Poland
State/province [55] 0 0
Rzeszow
Country [56] 0 0
Poland
State/province [56] 0 0
Szczecin
Country [57] 0 0
Poland
State/province [57] 0 0
Warszawa
Country [58] 0 0
Poland
State/province [58] 0 0
Wroclaw
Country [59] 0 0
Romania
State/province [59] 0 0
Bihor
Country [60] 0 0
Romania
State/province [60] 0 0
Bucuresti
Country [61] 0 0
Romania
State/province [61] 0 0
Timisoara
Country [62] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [62] 0 0
Novosibirsk
Country [63] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [63] 0 0
Omsk
Country [64] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [64] 0 0
Perm
Country [65] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [65] 0 0
Pushkin
Country [66] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [66] 0 0
Samara
Country [67] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [67] 0 0
St. Petersburg
Country [68] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [68] 0 0
Ulyanovsk
Country [69] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [69] 0 0
Zürich
Country [70] 0 0
Ukraine
State/province [70] 0 0
Kyiv
Country [71] 0 0
Ukraine
State/province [71] 0 0
Lviv
Country [72] 0 0
Ukraine
State/province [72] 0 0
Odesa
Country [73] 0 0
Ukraine
State/province [73] 0 0
Uzhgorod
Country [74] 0 0
Ukraine
State/province [74] 0 0
Vinnytsia
Country [75] 0 0
Ukraine
State/province [75] 0 0
Vinnytsya
Country [76] 0 0
Ukraine
State/province [76] 0 0
Zaporizhzhia
Country [77] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [77] 0 0
Glasgow

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Eli Lilly and Company
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)
Address 0 0
Eli Lilly and Company
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
What data in particular will be shared?
Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Clinical study report (CSR)
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Data are available 6 months after the primary publication and approval of the indication studied in the US and EU, whichever is later. Data will be indefinitely available for requesting.
Available to whom?
A research proposal must be approved by an independent review panel and researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.
Available for what types of analyses?
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://vivli.org/


What supporting documents are/will be available?

Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.