Reset your password and enable multi-factor authentication (MFA)


For ANZCTR account holders: to help ensure the cyber safety of your account, you’ll need to reset your password and set-up multi-factor authentication (MFA) as per the instructions below.


  1. Go to the Login page, click ‘reset password’ and follow the instructions.
  2. Check your email for the link to set a new password.
  3. Create a new password that meets requirements. New passwords must include at least one lowercase letter, one uppercase letter, one number and one special character (e.g. !#$%&@).
  4. Return to the Login page and enter your new password. A verification code will be sent to your email.
  5. Check your email for the code and enter it on the Login page. If the code is entered incorrectly, you can re-enter the correct one or request a new one.

Learn more about MFA and its importance on the Australian Signals Directorate website.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02611323




Registration number
NCT02611323
Ethics application status
Date submitted
19/11/2015
Date registered
20/11/2015
Date last updated
10/10/2023

Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of Obinutuzumab, Rituximab, Polatuzumab Vedotin, and Venetoclax in Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (FL) or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
Scientific title
A Phase Ib/II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Obinutuzumab in Combination With Polatuzumab Vedotin and Venetoclax in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma and Rituximab in Combination With Polatuzumab Vedotin and Venetoclax in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
2015-001998-40
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
GO29833
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - High grade lymphoma
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - Low grade lymphoma

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Obinutuzumab
Treatment: Drugs - Rituximab
Treatment: Drugs - Polatuzumab Vedotin
Treatment: Drugs - Venetoclax

Experimental: Dose-Escalation Cohort: FL - Participants with relapsed or refractory FL will receive 18 weeks of induction treatment with polatuzumab vedotin and venetoclax at escalating doses to identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for polatuzumab vedotin and venetoclax when combined with a fixed dose of obinutuzumab. Those who achieve CR, PR, or SD at the EOI will be eligible to receive a 24-month maintenance regimen consisting of 8 months of venetoclax and 24 months of obinutuzumab.

Experimental: Dose-Escalation Cohort: DLBCL - Participants with relapsed or refractory DLBCL will receive 18 weeks of induction treatment. Venetoclax will be administered at escalating doses to identify the RP2D of venetoclax when combined with fixed doses of polatuzumab vedotin and rituximab. Those who achieve CR or PR at the EOI will be eligible to receive an 8-month consolidation regimen consisting of venetoclax and rituximab.

Experimental: Expansion Cohort: FL - Participants with relapsed or refractory FL will receive 18 weeks of induction treatment with polatuzumab vedotin and venetoclax at the RP2D identified during the dose-escalation phase, in addition to obinutuzumab. Those who achieve CR, PR, or SD at the EOI will be eligible to receive a 24-month maintenance regimen consisting of 8 months of venetoclax and 24 months of obinutuzumab.

Experimental: Expansion Cohort: DLBCL - Participants with relapsed or refractory DLBCL will receive 18 weeks of induction treatment. Venetoclax will be administered at the RP2D identified during the dose-escalation phase, in addition to polatuzumab vedotin and rituximab. Those who achieve CR or PR at the EOI will be eligible to receive an 8-month consolidation regimen consisting of venetoclax and rituximab.


Treatment: Drugs: Obinutuzumab
Participants will receive a fixed dose of obinutuzumab, 1000 milligrams (mg) via intravenous (IV) infusion to be given on Days 1, 8 and 15 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 6. Cycle length will be 21 days. For eligible participants, post-induction treatment may be given at a dose of 1000 mg via IV infusion on Day 1 of every other month (starting from Month 2) for up to 24 months, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Treatment: Drugs: Rituximab
Participants will receive a fixed dose of rituximab, 375 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) via IV infusion to be given on Day 1 of Cycles 1 to 6. Cycle length will be 21 days. For eligible participants, post-induction treatment may be given at a dose of 375 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Day 1 of every other month (starting from Month 2) for up to 8 months, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Treatment: Drugs: Polatuzumab Vedotin
Participants will receive polatuzumab vedotin via IV infusion at doses of 1.4 or 1.8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (for FL), and 1.8 mg/kg (for DLBCL) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 18 weeks during induction treatment. Polatuzumab vedotin will not be given during the post-induction period.

Treatment: Drugs: Venetoclax
Participants will receive venetoclax film-coated tablets at doses of 200, 400, 600, or 800 mg (for FL), and 400, 600, or 800 mg (for DLBCL) on Days 1 to 21 of each 21-day cycle. Post-induction venetoclax may continue for up to 8 months, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI Determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) on the Basis of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) Scans
Assessment method [1] 0 0
CR at EOI was assessed by the IRC according to modified Lugano Response Criteria (MLRC) for Malignant Lymphoma 2014 using PET-CT scan. Per MLRC, CR was defined as complete metabolic response (MR) in lymph nodes and extra lymphatic sites (ELS) with a score of 1, 2, or 3, with or without a residual mass on PET 5-point scale (5-PS), where 1=no uptake above background; 2= uptake =mediastinum; 3= uptake \> mediastinum but = liver; 4=uptake moderately \> liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions. No new lesions; no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. 90% confidence interval (CI) for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21 days)
Primary outcome [2] 0 0
FL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Assessment method [2] 0 0
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any new disease or worsening of an existing disease were also considered as AEs. An SAE was defined as any AE that was fatal, life threatening, requires prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in significant disability or resulted in a congenital anomaly to a mother exposed to study treatment. AEs and SAEs were reported based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs, version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE, v4.0). Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
From study start to 24 months after last dose of study drug (approximately 56 months)
Primary outcome [3] 0 0
DLBCL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With AEs and SAEs
Assessment method [3] 0 0
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any new disease or worsening of an existing disease were also considered as AEs. An SAE was defined as any AE that was fatal, life threatening, requires prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in significant disability or resulted in a congenital anomaly to a mother exposed to study treatment. AEs and SAEs were reported based on the NCI-CTCAE, v4.0. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
Timepoint [3] 0 0
From study start to 3 months after last dose of study drug (approximately 21 months)
Primary outcome [4] 0 0
Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Assessment method [4] 0 0
DLT=any one of the events that occurred in first treatment cycle \& per the investigator was related to study treatment. Any AE that lead to a delay of \> 14 days in start of next treatment cycle; Any Grade 3/4 non-hematologic AE with few exceptions; Any increase in hepatic transaminase \>3×baseline(BL) \& increase in direct bilirubin \>2×upper limit of normal (ULN), without any findings of cholestasis/jaundice/signs of hepatic dysfunction \& in absence of other contributory factors; Grade1 alanine transaminase (ALT)/aspartate transaminase (AST) elevation at BL as result of liver metastases, only a Grade =3 elevation, also =3×BL lasting \>7 days; Hematologic AE meeting protocol specified criteria. Events were graded per NCI CTCAE v4.0. Grade 1:Mild; asymptomatic/mild symptoms; Grade 2:Moderate;minimal,local/non-invasive intervention indicated; Grade 3:Severe/medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4:Life-threatening consequences/urgent intervention indicated.
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Day 1 of Cycle 1 to Day 1 of Cycle 2 (1 cycle=21 days) in dose-escalation phase
Primary outcome [5] 0 0
RP2D of Polatuzumab Vedotin
Assessment method [5] 0 0
RP2D was defined as the highest dose with acceptable toxicity as determined from dose-escalation phase. The RP2D of polatuzumab vedotin when given in combination with fixed dose of obinutuzumab in participants with FL was determined.
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Day 1 of Cycle 1 to Day 1 of Cycle 2 (1 cycle=21 days) in dose-escalation phase
Primary outcome [6] 0 0
RP2D of Venetoclax
Assessment method [6] 0 0
RP2D was defined as the highest dose with acceptable toxicity as determined from dose-escalation phase. The RP2D of venetoclax when given in combination with fixed dose of polatuzumab vedotin in participants with FL and DLBCL was determined.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
Day 1 of Cycle 1 to Day 1 of Cycle 2 (1 cycle=21 days) in dose-escalation phase
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI, Determined by the Investigator on the Basis of PET-CT Scans
Assessment method [1] 0 0
CR at EOI was assessed by Investigator according to MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5PS where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake = mediastinum; 3=uptake \> mediastinum but = liver; 4=uptake moderately \> liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. 90% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI, Determined by the IRC on the Basis of CT Scans Alone
Assessment method [2] 0 0
CR at EOI was determined by IRC according to the MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to = 1.5 centimeters (cm) in longest transverse diameter (LDi) and no ELS of disease; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry (IHC) negative. 90% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI, Determined by the Investigator on the Basis of CT Scans Alone
Assessment method [3] 0 0
CR at EOI was determined by Investigator according to the MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to = 1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. 90% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method.
Timepoint [3] 0 0
6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) at EOI, Determined by an IRC on the Basis of PET and CT Scans
Assessment method [4] 0 0
OR=percentage of participants with CR or PR as assessed by the IRC according to MLRC. Per MLRC CR based on PET-CT=complete MR in lymph nodes \& ELS with score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass on 5PS, where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake = mediastinum; 3=uptake\> mediastinum but = liver; 4=uptake moderately \> liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions \& no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR based on PET-CT=partial MR in lymph nodes \& ELS with score of 4 or 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline \& residual masses of any size: at interim (suggest responding disease) or at end of treatment (indicate residual disease), residual uptake higher than uptake in normal bone marrow but reduced compared with baseline (diffuse uptake compatible with reactive changes from chemotherapy allowed). 90% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
Timepoint [4] 0 0
6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With OR at EOI, Determined by the Investigator on the Basis of PET and CT Scans
Assessment method [5] 0 0
OR=percentage of participants with CR or PR as assessed by the IRC according to MLRC. Per MLRC CR based on PET-CT=complete MR in lymph nodes \& ELS with score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass on 5PS, where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake = mediastinum; 3=uptake\> mediastinum but = liver; 4=uptake moderately \> liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions;no new lesions \& no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR based on PET-CT=partial MR in lymph nodes \& ELS with score of 4 or 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline \& residual masses of any size: at interim (suggest responding disease) or at end of treatment (indicate residual disease), residual uptake higher than uptake in normal bone marrow but reduced compared with baseline (diffuse uptake compatible with reactive changes from chemotherapy allowed). 90% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
Timepoint [5] 0 0
6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With OR at EOI, Determined by an IRC on the Basis of CT Scans Alone
Assessment method [6] 0 0
OR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR, as assessed by the IRC based on MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to = 1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; bone marrow normal by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. PR per CT only was defined as partial remission in lymph nodes and ELS with =50% decrease in the sum of the products of greatest diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable lymph nodes and extranodal sites, absent/normal/regressed but with no increase in non-measured lesions, spleen regressing by =50% in length beyond normal, no new sites of lesions. 90% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
Secondary outcome [7] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With OR at EOI, Determined by the Investigator on the Basis of CT Scans Alone
Assessment method [7] 0 0
OR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR, as assessed by the investigator based on MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to = 1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; bone marrow normal by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. PR per CT only was defined as partial remission in lymph nodes and ELS with =50% decrease in the SPD of up to 6 target measurable lymph nodes and extranodal sites, absent/normal/regressed but with no increase in non-measured lesions, spleen regressing by =50% in length beyond normal, no new sites of lesions. 90% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
Timepoint [7] 0 0
6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
Secondary outcome [8] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) of CR or PR, Determined by the Investigator on the Basis of CT Scans Alone
Assessment method [8] 0 0
BOR=CR or PR as assessed by investigator per CT per MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as a complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to = 1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; bone marrow normal by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. PR per CT only was defined as partial remission in lymph nodes and ELS with =50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable lymph nodes and extranodal sites, absent/normal/regressed but with no increase in non-measured lesions, spleen regressing by =50% in length beyond normal, no new sites of lesions. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
Timepoint [8] 0 0
Up to every 6 months until disease progression, the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment, or the end of the study, whichever occurs first (approximately 77 months)
Secondary outcome [9] 0 0
Observed Serum Obinutuzumab Concentration
Assessment method [9] 0 0
Timepoint [9] 0 0
Pre-dose & 0.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 Cycles 1, 2, 4, & 6; and pre-dose on Day 1 of Months 2, 8, 14, 20; study drug discontinuation, Day 120 &1 year post-last dose (up to approximately 40 months) (1 cycle = 21 days)
Secondary outcome [10] 0 0
Observed Serum Rituximab Concentration
Assessment method [10] 0 0
Timepoint [10] 0 0
Pre-dose and 0.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 6; pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 4; (1 cycle = 21 days)
Secondary outcome [11] 0 0
Observed Serum Concentration of Total Antibody to Polatuzumab Vedotin
Assessment method [11] 0 0
Total antibody is an analyte of polatuzumab vedotin.
Timepoint [11] 0 0
Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2 and 4; study drug discontinuation visit; Day 120 and 1 year post-last dose (up to approximately 16 months) (1 cycle=21 days)
Secondary outcome [12] 0 0
Observed Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Antibody-Conjugated Mono-Methyl Auristatin E (MMAE) (acMMAE)
Assessment method [12] 0 0
acMMAE is an analyte of polatuzumab vedotin.
Timepoint [12] 0 0
Pre-dose and 0.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2 and 4; post-dose on Days 8 and 15 of Cycle 1; predose on Day 1 of Cycle 6 (1 cycle=21 days)
Secondary outcome [13] 0 0
Observed Plasma Concentration of Polatuzumab Vedotin Unconjugated MMAE
Assessment method [13] 0 0
MMAE is an analyte of polatuzumab vedotin.
Timepoint [13] 0 0
Pre-dose and 0.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2 and 4; post-dose on Days 8 and 15 of Cycle 1; predose on Day 1 of Cycle 6 (1 cycle=21 days)
Secondary outcome [14] 0 0
Observed Plasma Venetoclax Concentration
Assessment method [14] 0 0
Timepoint [14] 0 0
Pre-dose and 4 hours post-dose on Day 1 Cycle 1, pre-dose & 2, 4, 6, & 8 hours post-dose on Day 1 Cycle 2, pre-dose & 4hours post-dose on Day 1 Cycle 4 & pre-dose on Day 1 Cycle 6; (1 cycle = 21 days)
Secondary outcome [15] 0 0
Number of Participants With Human Anti-Human Antibodies (HAHAs) to Obinutuzumab
Assessment method [15] 0 0
The number of participants with positive results for HAHAs, also called anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against obinutuzumab at baseline and at any of the post-baseline assessment time-points were reported. Number of participants positive for Treatment Emergent ADA = the number of post-baseline evaluable participants determined to have treatment induced ADA or treatment-enhanced ADA during the study period. Treatment-induced ADA = negative or missing baseline ADA result(s) and at least one positive post-baseline ADA result. Treatment-enhanced ADA = a participant with positive ADA result at baseline who has one or more post-baseline titer results that are at least 0.60 titer unit (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result.
Timepoint [15] 0 0
Baseline up to approximately 2 years after last dose (up to approximately 56 months)
Secondary outcome [16] 0 0
Number of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Polatuzumab Vedotin
Assessment method [16] 0 0
The number of participants with positive results for ATAs, also called ADAs against polatuzumab vedotin at baseline and at any of the post-baseline assessment time-points were reported. Number of participants positive for Treatment Emergent ADA = the number of post-baseline evaluable participants determined to have treatment induced ADA or treatment-enhanced ADA during the study period. Treatment-induced ADA = negative or missing baseline ADA result(s) and at least one positive post-baseline ADA result. Treatment-enhanced ADA = a participant with positive ADA result at baseline who has one or more post-baseline titer results that are at least 0.60 t.u. greater than the baseline titer result.
Timepoint [16] 0 0
Baseline up to 1 year post last dose (up to approximately 16 months)

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2
* For obinutuzumab + polatuzumab vedotin + venetoclax treatment group, relapsed or refractory FL after treatment with at least one prior chemoimmunotherapy regimen that included an anti-cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20) (anti-CD20) monoclonal antibody (mAb) and for which no other more appropriate treatment option exists, as determined by the investigator
* For rituximab + polatuzumab vedotin + venetoclax treatment group, relapsed or refractory DLBCL after treatment with at least one prior chemoimmunotherapy regimen that included an anti-CD20 mAb and for which no curative option exists as determined by the investigator
* At least one bidimensionally measurable lesion
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Known CD20-negative status at relapse or progression
* Prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), or autologous SCT within 100 days prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1
* Grade 3b FL
* History of transformation of indolent disease to DLBCL
* Current use of systemic corticosteroids greater than (>) 20 mg prednisone per day (or equivalent); or prior anti-cancer therapy to include: radioimmunoconjugate within 12 weeks; mAb or antibody-drug conjugate within 4 weeks; or radiotherapy/chemotherapy/hormone therapy/targeted small-molecule therapy within 2 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1
* Central nervous system (CNS) disease
* Active infection
* Actual or potential cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A interactions including: requirement for warfarin; use of strong and moderate CYP3A inhibitors or inducers within 7 days prior to first dose of venetoclax; or consumption of grapefruit, Seville oranges, or star fruit within 3 days prior to first dose of venetoclax
* Positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B or C
* Receipt of a live virus vaccine within 28 days prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1
* Poor hematologic, renal, or hepatic function
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Life expectancy <3 months

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 1
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,TAS,VIC
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Royal North Shore Hospital; Haematology Department - St. Leonards
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
Calvary Mater Newcastle - Waratah
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
Princess Alexandra Hospital - Woolloongabba
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Adelaide
Recruitment hospital [5] 0 0
Royal Hobart Hospital - Hobart
Recruitment hospital [6] 0 0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Center - North Melbourne
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2065 - St. Leonards
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
2298 - Waratah
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
4102 - Woolloongabba
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
5011 - Adelaide
Recruitment postcode(s) [5] 0 0
7000 - Hobart
Recruitment postcode(s) [6] 0 0
3051 - North Melbourne
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Arizona
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Connecticut
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Florida
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Georgia
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Kentucky
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Michigan
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
New Jersey
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
New York
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Texas
Country [11] 0 0
Italy
State/province [11] 0 0
Emilia-Romagna
Country [12] 0 0
Italy
State/province [12] 0 0
Lombardia
Country [13] 0 0
Italy
State/province [13] 0 0
Piemonte

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Hoffmann-La Roche
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Clinical Trials
Address 0 0
Hoffmann-La Roche
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.