Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
A database of clinical trials and their results from Australia, New Zealand, and other countries.
account_circle
Log in
to register or update your trial
search
Search for trials
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625001065482
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
11/09/2025
Date registered
29/09/2025
Date last updated
29/09/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
29/09/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A study comparing Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice and traditional Simulation on nurses' performance in a simulated scenario
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP) and Traditional Immersive Simulation (TIS) On Nurses' Resuscitation Performance in a Simulated Scenario
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
315304
0
Nil Known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Resuscitation
338774
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Emergency medicine
335069
335069
0
0
Query!
Resuscitation
Query!
Public Health
335216
335216
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants allocated to the intervention arm will receive Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP) as an education method for resuscitation training.
In this intervention arm, participants will receive training over one hour, Face to Face, on one allocated day:
- 5-minute pre brief and Basic Life Support confidence survey
- 20-minute RCDP resuscitation training session - Participants work through a clinical scenario which is broken up into small sections. During each section participants practice clinical skills (e.g. CPR, Defibrillation, and Airway skills and are provided with immediate feedback and debriefing. Sections are then repeated until skill mastery is achieved.
- 5-minute NASA TLX - Participants will complete the NASA TLX tool immediately after the RCDP training session. The NASA TLX is a tool used to assess self perceived workload. It measures six dimensions: mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration. This tool will assist in assessing cognitive load of training received. NASA TLX sourced from NASA Human Systems Integration Division.
- 10-minute uninterrupted clinical scenario. Participants work through a full clinical scenario (e.g. cardiac arrest scenario) using a manikin. The scenario runs without instructor interruption to capture team resuscitation performance (e.g. CPR quality, timely defibrillation),
- 20 minute debrief.
* Informational materials that would be used include:
- Scenario guides (includes simulated clinical notes for participants to use during their simulation). Designed specifically for this study.
- Facilitator guides (instructions for running simulations/training sessions). Designed specifically for this study.
- Debriefing tool to facilitate debriefing. Sourced from St George Hospital and Debreif2Learn.org
- Basic Life Support education poster. Sourced from the Australian Resuscitation Council
* Physical materials:
- Laerdal QCPR Mannequin
- Simulated defibrillator - Realiti Sourced from iSimulate
- Clinical equipment (resuscitation equipment - Airway equipment)
The training sessions within this intervention arm will be delivered by Nursing educators who have been trained in RCDP method.
The location of the intervention will be in a purpose-built education center e.g. Clinical Skills Centre within an acute in-patient hospital.
Adherence to the intervention will be through direct observation. Researchers will be using facilitator guides during training sessions to ensure intervention adherence occurs.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
331907
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Participants allocated to the control arm will receive Traditional Immersive Simulation (TIS) as an education method for resuscitation training.
In this arm, the participants will receive training over one hour. Face to Face. On one allocated day:
- 5-minute pre brief & BLS confidence survey
-20-minute Resuscitation TIS training session. Which involves a demonstration of Basic Life Support maneuvers performed by the researchers, theory review of Basic Life Support, and a clinical resuscitation simulation participants will participate in. This scenario runs from start to finish without interruption from researchers.
-5-minute NASA TLX
-10-minute recorded uninterrupted simulated resuscitation scenario
-20-minutes debrief
The training sessions within the control arm will be delivered by Nursing educators who have been trained in TIS method.
he location of the intervention will be in a purpose-built education center e.g. Clinical Skills Centre within an acute in-patient hospital.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
342701
0
Time taken to delivery of defibrillation in a simulated scenario
Query!
Assessment method [1]
342701
0
Time (in seconds) to first defibrillation will be measured using time stamped simulation video recordings. The metric will be analyzed as a continuous variable and compared between two groups using independent t-test or Mann-Whiteny U test, depending on data distribution.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
342701
0
Time interval (seconds) between the onset of cardiac arrest and delivery of first defibrillation during a simulated clinical scenario.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
451867
0
Perceived cognitive load associated with training method used (RCDP vs TIS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
451867
0
NASA-TLX tool
Query!
Timepoint [1]
451867
0
Outcome will be assessed following simulation training method delivery.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
452287
0
Time taken to first chest compression in a simulated clinical scenario
Query!
Assessment method [2]
452287
0
Time (in seconds) to first chest compression will be measured using time stamped simulation video recordings. The metric will be analyzed as a continuous variable and compared between two groups using independent t-test or Mann-Whiteny U test, depending on data distribution.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
452287
0
Time interval (seconds) between the onset of cardiac arrest and first chest compression during a simulated clinical scenario. Data will be obtained from uninterrupted video recording
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
452291
0
To measure chest compression quality.: chest compression rate,
Query!
Assessment method [3]
452291
0
chest compression rate (compressions per minute) will be expressed as mean ± SD or median [IQR] as appropriate.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
452291
0
Chest compression rate will be captured using the Little Annie qCPR Laerdal mannequin. Data will be obtained after the simulated scenario has been competed
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
452638
0
To measure chest compression quality: chest compression depth
Query!
Assessment method [4]
452638
0
Chest compression depth (measured in mm) will be expressed as mean ± SD or median [IQR] as appropriate.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
452638
0
Chest compression depthwill be captured using the Little Annie qCPR Laerdal mannequin. Data will be obtained after the simulated scenario has been competed
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
452639
0
To measure chest compression quality: chest compression fraction
Query!
Assessment method [5]
452639
0
Continuous variables such as chest compression fraction (measured in % of time compressions are performed during a resuscitation) will be expressed as mean ± SD or median [IQR] as appropriate.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
452639
0
Chest compression depth will be captured using the Little Annie qCPR Laerdal mannequin. Data will be obtained after the simulated scenario has been competed.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
452640
0
To measure chest compression quality: chest compression no flow.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
452640
0
Continuous variables such as chest compression no flow time (% of time patient had no compressions immediately post defibrillation in a simulated clinical scenario. ) will be expressed as mean ± SD or median [IQR] as appropriate.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
452640
0
Chest compression no flow time will be captured using the Little Annie qCPR Laerdal mannequin. Data will be obtained after the simulated scenario has been competed.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Nurses employed in an acute care in patient hospital
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Unable to give consent
2. Nurses who have previously received RCDP resuscitation training
3. Registered Midwife (direct entry midwife)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelope
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Permuted block randomization with block sizes of four or six using blockrand in R.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The following assumptions regarding the endpoint of time from cardiac arrest to first defibrillation are made for the sample size calculation:
Estimated average time to defibrillation is 150 seconds
Estimated improvement in first defibrillation time is 30 seconds and a standard deviation of 30 seconds.
Based on the above assumptions and findings from previous studies it is projected that approximately 230 participants will be needed to form a total 46 teams (up to 5 participants in each team). Using a two sided test with alpha of 0.05 and 90% power (beta of 0.10), the sample size calculation estimates a requirement of 23 teams per arm.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/10/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/04/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/04/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
230
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
28416
0
St George Hospital - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
44644
0
2217 - Kogarah
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
319878
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
319878
0
South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service In Kind Support
Query!
Address [1]
319878
0
Query!
Country [1]
319878
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Government body
Query!
Name
South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
322407
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
322407
0
Query!
Address [1]
322407
0
Query!
Country [1]
322407
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
318430
0
South Eastern Sydney Local Health District HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
318430
0
https://www.seslhd.health.nsw.gov.au/services-clinics/directory/research-home/ethics
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
318430
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
318430
0
05/08/2025
Query!
Approval date [1]
318430
0
04/09/2025
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
318430
0
2025/ETH01229
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study aims to find out which simulation training method helps nurses perform better during a simulated resuscitation. It compares two approaches: Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP), which involves short, repeated practice with immediate feedback, and Traditional Immersive Simulation (TIS), which uses longer, more realistic scenarios and formal debriefing feedback. The main goal is to see which method results in better resuscitation performance such as faster delivery of defibrillation and higher quality chest compressions. We hypothesize that nurses trained with RCDP will perform this critical step more quickly than those trained with TIS.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
144166
0
Mr Benjamin Wood
Query!
Address
144166
0
St George Hospital, 28 Gray St, Kogarah. 2217 NSW
Query!
Country
144166
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
144166
0
+61 456 923 943
Query!
Fax
144166
0
Query!
Email
144166
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
144167
0
Benjamin Wood
Query!
Address
144167
0
St George Hospital, 28 Gray St, Kogarah 2217 NSW
Query!
Country
144167
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
144167
0
+61 456 923 943
Query!
Fax
144167
0
Query!
Email
144167
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
144168
0
Benjamin Wood
Query!
Address
144168
0
St George Hospital, 28 Gray St, Kogarah 2217 NSW
Query!
Country
144168
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
144168
0
+61291132387
Query!
Fax
144168
0
Query!
Email
144168
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
Yes
Will there be any conditions when requesting access to individual participant data?
Persons/groups eligible to request access:
•
Researchers
Conditions for requesting access:
•
Yes, conditions apply:
•
Requires approval by an ethics committee
What individual participant data might be shared?
•
De-identified individual participant data:
•
All outcomes data
What types of analyses could be done with individual participant data?
•
Any type of analysis (i.e. no restrictions on data re-use)
When can requests for individual participant data be made (start and end dates)?
From:
After publication of main results
To:
Not yet decided
Where can requests to access individual participant data be made, or data be obtained directly?
•
Email of trial custodian, sponsor or committee:
[email protected]
Are there extra considerations when requesting access to individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
Ethical approval
Re 2025ETH01229 Application HREA Approved.pdf
Informed consent form
2025_ETH01229_v1_02 - Participant Information Sheet and Consent. V3. 21.8.25. CLEAN.docx
Study protocol
RCDPProtocol_v3 (1)CLEAN (4).docx
Other
Study Flyer
Basic Life support training. FLYER. V1.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF