Please note the ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1-2 pm (AEST) on Thursday, the 19th of June for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.


Reset your password and enable multi-factor authentication (MFA)


For ANZCTR account holders: to help ensure the cyber safety of your account, you’ll need to reset your password and set-up multi-factor authentication (MFA) as per the instructions below.


  1. Go to the Login page, click ‘reset password’ and follow the instructions.
  2. Check your email for the link to set a new password.
  3. Create a new password that meets requirements.
  4. Return to the Login page and enter your new password. A verification code will be sent to your email.
  5. Check your email for the code and enter it on the Login page. If the code is entered incorrectly, you can re-enter the correct one or request a new one.

Learn more about MFA and its importance on the Australian Signals Directorate website.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03400033


Additional trial details provided through ANZCTR are available at the end of this record.


Registration number
NCT03400033
Ethics application status
Date submitted
8/01/2018
Date registered
17/01/2018
Date last updated
12/07/2021

Titles & IDs
Public title
Anemia Studies in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Erythropoiesis Via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor (PHI) Daprodustat-Three-times Weekly Dosing in Dialysis (ASCEND-TD)
Scientific title
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-center Study in Hemodialysis Participants With Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Three-times Weekly Dosing of Daprodustat Compared to Recombinant Human Erythropoietin, Following a Switch From Recombinant Human Erythropoietin or Its Analogs
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
2017-004372-56
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
204837
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Anaemia 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Renal and Urogenital 0 0 0 0
Kidney disease
Renal and Urogenital 0 0 0 0
Other renal and urogenital disorders
Blood 0 0 0 0
Anaemia

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Daprodustat tablets
Treatment: Drugs - Matching placebo tablets
Treatment: Drugs - Epoetin alfa vials
Treatment: Drugs - Saline vials or bags

Experimental: Daprodustat - Subjects randomized to this arm will receive daprodustat tablets titrated doses from 2 to 48 milligrams orally three-times weekly along with saline by IV route for the 52 weeks treatment period.

Active comparator: Epoetin alfa - Subjects randomized to this arm will receive matching placebo tablets to daprodustat orally three-times weekly and Epoetin alfa by IV route for the 52 weeks treatment period.


Treatment: Drugs: Daprodustat tablets
Round, biconvex, white, film-coated tablet in unit dose strengths 2 and 4 milligrams (7 millimeter tablets), 6, 8 and 10 milligrams (9 millimeter tablets) administered by the oral route.

Treatment: Drugs: Matching placebo tablets
Matching placebo to daprodustat tablets supplied as round, biconvex, white, film-coated tablet in unit dose strengths 2 and 4 milligrams (7 millimeter tablets), 6, 8 and 10 milligrams (9 millimeter tablets) administered by the oral route.

Treatment: Drugs: Epoetin alfa vials
Single-dose, preservative-free vials in unit dose strengths of 2000, 3000, 4000 and 10,000 Units/milliliter administered by the IV route.

Treatment: Drugs: Saline vials or bags
0.9% sodium chloride saline vials or bags administered by the IV route.

Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels Over the Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Assessment method [1] 0 0
Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Hemoglobin during the evaluation period was defined as the mean of all available post-randomization hemoglobin values (on and off-treatment) during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52). For the primary analysis, the missing post-Baseline hemoglobin values were imputed using pre-specified multiple imputations. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the average of post-randomization values during the evaluation period minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with terms for treatment, Baseline hemoglobin, and region.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Mean Average Monthly On-treatment Intravenous (IV) Iron Dose Per Participant
Assessment method [1] 0 0
Average monthly IV iron dose (mg) per participant during Day 1 to Week 52 was determined by calculating the total IV iron dose per participant from Day 1 to Week 52 while the participant was on study treatment and dividing by (the number of days the participant was on study treatment divided by 30.4375 days). Analysis was performed using the ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, Baseline monthly IV iron dose, and region.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Day 1 to Week 52
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels at Week 52
Assessment method [2] 0 0
Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-randomization visit value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model fitted to hemoglobin data collected after Baseline up to Week 52, excluding values collected during the stabilization period (Day 1 to Week 28). The model included factors for treatment, time, region, Baseline hemoglobin and Baseline hemoglobin by time and treatment by time interaction terms.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 52
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Percentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) Over Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Assessment method [3] 0 0
Participants received treatment during the study to achieve or maintain hemoglobin level in the target range. Percentage of time for which hemoglobin level was maintained within the analysis range (10 to 11.5 grams/deciliter) has been presented.
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Week 28 to Week 52
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Number of Hemoglobin Responders in the Hemoglobin Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) Over Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Assessment method [4] 0 0
Mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period was defined as the mean of all evaluable hemoglobin values during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52) including any evaluable unscheduled hemoglobin values that were taken during this time period. Hemoglobin responders were defined as the number of participants with a mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period that falls within the hemoglobin analysis range of 10-11.5 grams/deciliter.
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Week 28 to Week 52
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Percentage of Participants Permanently Stopping Study Treatment Due to Meeting Rescue Criteria
Assessment method [5] 0 0
Percentage of participants permanently stopping study treatment due to meeting rescue criteria has been presented.
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Up to Week 52
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) at Week 52
Assessment method [6] 0 0
Measurements for SBP, DBP and MAP were taken with the participant in a semi-supine or seated position in the dialysis chair after at least a 5-minute rest period. MAP is the average BP in an individual's arteries during a single cardiac cycle. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using MMRM model with treatment group, time, region, Baseline value, Baseline value\*time, treatment group\*time as variables.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
Baseline (Week -4 ) and Week 52
Secondary outcome [7] 0 0
Change From Baseline in SBP, DBP and MAP at End of Treatment
Assessment method [7] 0 0
Measurements for SBP, DBP and MAP were taken with the participant in a semi-supine or seated position in the dialysis chair after at least a 5-minute rest period. MAP is the average BP in an individual's arteries during a single cardiac cycle. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the last on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with terms for treatment group, region and Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error have been presented.
Timepoint [7] 0 0
Baseline (Week -4) and end of treatment (last on-treatment value until Week 52)
Secondary outcome [8] 0 0
Blood Pressure (BP) Exacerbation Event Rate Per 100 Participant Years
Assessment method [8] 0 0
BP exacerbation event is defined (based on post-dialysis BP) as SBP \>=25 mmHg increased from Baseline or SBP \>=180 mmHg; or DBP \>=15 mmHg increased from Baseline or DBP \>=110 mmHg. The BP exacerbation events per 100 participant years was estimated using the Negative Binomial Model.
Timepoint [8] 0 0
Up to 52 weeks
Secondary outcome [9] 0 0
Number of Participants With at Least One BP Exacerbation Event During the Study
Assessment method [9] 0 0
BP exacerbation (based on post-dialysis BP) is defined as: SBP \>= 25 mmHg increased from Baseline or SBP \>=180mmHg; or DBP \>=15 mmHg increase from Baseline or DBP \>=110 mmHg. Number of participants with at least 1 BP exacerbation event have been reported.
Timepoint [9] 0 0
Up to 52 weeks
Secondary outcome [10] 0 0
Change From Baseline at Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)
Assessment method [10] 0 0
The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of disease severity of their anemia of Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is measured on a 5-point disease severity scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe), higher score indicates more disease severity. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in on-treatment PGI-S scores was defined as the on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using MMRM model fitted from Baseline up to Week 52 with factors for treatment, time, region, Baseline value and Baseline value by time and treatment by time interactions.
Timepoint [10] 0 0
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
Secondary outcome [11] 0 0
Pre-dose Trough Concentration (Ctau) of Daprodustat (GSK1278863) and Its Metabolites GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13)
Assessment method [11] 0 0
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of daprodustat (GSK1278863) and its metabolites: GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13).
Timepoint [11] 0 0
Pre-dose on Day 1; Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post-dose on any one post-Baseline visit day between Week 8 and Week 52
Secondary outcome [12] 0 0
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Daprodustat (GSK1278863) and Its Metabolites GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13)
Assessment method [12] 0 0
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of daprodustat (GSK1278863) and its metabolites: GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13).
Timepoint [12] 0 0
Pre-dose on Day 1; Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post-dose on any one post-Baseline visit day between Week 8 and Week 52

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Subject must be 18 to 99 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.
* Use of any approved rhEPO or analog for at least 8 weeks prior to the screening visit and continuing during the screening period until randomization (Day 1).
* Hgb concentration (measured by HemoCue) within the following range: Week -4: Hgb 8 to 11.5 grams/deciliter (5 to 7.1 millimoles/liter). If Hgb is 11.6 to 11.9 grams/deciliter (7.2 to 7.4 millimoles/liter), up to two retests are allowed; the retest value must be between 8 to 11.5 grams/deciliter (5 to 7.1 millimoles/liter). Day 1: Hgb 8 to 11 grams/deciliter (5 to 6.8 millimoles/liter) and receiving at least the minimum rhEPO or analog dose 3. Hgb>11 to 11.5 grams/deciliter (6.8 to 7.1 millimoles/liter) and receiving greater than the minimum rhEPO or analog dose 3.
* On hemodialysis (including hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration) >90 days prior to screening and continuing during the screening period.
* On hemodialysis (in-center) >=3 times per week.
* Male and female subjects are eligible. A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP), or A WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance from at least 28 days prior to first dose of study treatment and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study treatment.
* Capable of giving signed informed consent.
* In France, a subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study if he or she is either affiliated to or beneficiary of a social security category.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
99 Years
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Planned living-related or living-unrelated kidney transplant within 52 weeks after randomization (Day 1).
* Ferritin: <=100 nanograms/milliliter (<=100 micrograms/liter), at screening.
* Transferrin saturation (TSAT): <=20 percent, at screening. If TSAT is 18 to 20 percent, then a retest using a new blood sample can be obtained within 7 days of the final laboratory report; the final retest value must be >20 percent to confirm eligibility.
* Aplasias: History of bone marrow aplasia or pure red cell aplasia.
* Conditions, other than anemia of CKD, which can affect erythropoiesis.
* Myocardial infarction (MI) or acute coronary syndrome within 8 weeks prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
* Stroke or transient ischemic attack within 8 weeks prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
* Heart failure (HF): Chronic Class IV HF, as defined by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system.
* Current uncontrolled hypertension as determined by the investigator that would contraindicate the use of rhEPO.
* Bazett's correction of QTc interval (QTcB): at Day 1: QTcB >500 milliseconds, or QTcB >530 milliseconds in subjects with bundle branch block. There is no QTc (corrected QT) exclusion for subjects with a predominantly ventricular paced rhythm.
* Liver Disease: presence of any one of the following liver-related laboratory values or conditions, at screening, is exclusionary: ALT >2x upper limit of normal (ULN); Bilirubin >1.5x ULN; or Current unstable liver or biliary disease per investigator assessment, generally defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, persistent jaundice, or cirrhosis.
* Evidence of actively bleeding gastric, duodenal or esophageal ulcer disease OR clinically significant gastro intestinal bleeding <= 8 weeks prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
* History of malignancy within 2 years prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1), currently receiving treatment for cancer, or complex kidney cyst (e.g., Bosniak Category IIF, III or IV) >3 centimeters.
* Use of a strong inhibitor of Cytochrome P4502C8 [CYP2C8] (e.g. gemfibrozil) or a strong inducer of CYP2C8 (e.g. rifampin/rifampicin).
* History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or hypersensitivity to excipients in the investigational product (daprodustat) or epoetin alfa.
* Use of another investigational agent within 30 days or within five half-lives of the investigational agent (whichever is longer) or currently participating in a study of an investigational device prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
* Any prior treatment with daprodustat for treatment duration of >30 days.
* Any other condition, clinical or laboratory abnormality, or examination finding that the investigator considers would put the subject at unacceptable risk, which may affect study compliance (e.g. intolerance to rhEPO) or prevent understanding of the aims or investigational procedures or possible consequences of the study.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
GSK Investigational Site - Heidelberg
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
GSK Investigational Site - Parkville
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
3084 - Heidelberg
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
3050 - Parkville
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Arizona
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
California
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Connecticut
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Florida
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Georgia
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Idaho
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Massachusetts
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Missouri
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
New Mexico
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
New York
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
Oklahoma
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
Texas
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
Virginia
Country [15] 0 0
Argentina
State/province [15] 0 0
Buenos Aires
Country [16] 0 0
Argentina
State/province [16] 0 0
Santa Fe
Country [17] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [17] 0 0
Bahia
Country [18] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [18] 0 0
Paraná
Country [19] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [19] 0 0
Rio Grande Do Sul
Country [20] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [20] 0 0
São Paulo
Country [21] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [21] 0 0
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais
Country [22] 0 0
Canada
State/province [22] 0 0
Ontario
Country [23] 0 0
France
State/province [23] 0 0
Bayonne
Country [24] 0 0
France
State/province [24] 0 0
Epagny Metz-Tessy
Country [25] 0 0
France
State/province [25] 0 0
Le Mans
Country [26] 0 0
France
State/province [26] 0 0
Nice Cedex 1
Country [27] 0 0
France
State/province [27] 0 0
Strasbourg
Country [28] 0 0
Italy
State/province [28] 0 0
Emilia-Romagna
Country [29] 0 0
Italy
State/province [29] 0 0
Lombardia
Country [30] 0 0
Italy
State/province [30] 0 0
Veneto
Country [31] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [31] 0 0
Anyang-Si, Gyeonggi-do
Country [32] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [32] 0 0
Busan
Country [33] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [33] 0 0
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do
Country [34] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [34] 0 0
Incheon
Country [35] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [35] 0 0
Seoul
Country [36] 0 0
Poland
State/province [36] 0 0
Katowice
Country [37] 0 0
Poland
State/province [37] 0 0
Lodz
Country [38] 0 0
Poland
State/province [38] 0 0
Sandomierz
Country [39] 0 0
Poland
State/province [39] 0 0
Tarnowskie Gory
Country [40] 0 0
Poland
State/province [40] 0 0
Zyrardow
Country [41] 0 0
Romania
State/province [41] 0 0
Constanta
Country [42] 0 0
Romania
State/province [42] 0 0
Resita
Country [43] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [43] 0 0
Kazan
Country [44] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [44] 0 0
Kolomna
Country [45] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [45] 0 0
Krasnodar
Country [46] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [46] 0 0
Krasnogorsk
Country [47] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [47] 0 0
Mytischi
Country [48] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [48] 0 0
Novorossiysk
Country [49] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [49] 0 0
Novosibirsk
Country [50] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [50] 0 0
Omsk
Country [51] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [51] 0 0
Orenburg
Country [52] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [52] 0 0
Penza
Country [53] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [53] 0 0
Podolsk
Country [54] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [54] 0 0
Saint-Petersburg
Country [55] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [55] 0 0
St-Petersburg
Country [56] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [56] 0 0
St. Petersburg
Country [57] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [57] 0 0
Ufa
Country [58] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [58] 0 0
Yaroslavl
Country [59] 0 0
Spain
State/province [59] 0 0
Almeria
Country [60] 0 0
Spain
State/province [60] 0 0
Badalona
Country [61] 0 0
Spain
State/province [61] 0 0
Barcelona
Country [62] 0 0
Spain
State/province [62] 0 0
Gerona
Country [63] 0 0
Spain
State/province [63] 0 0
Granollers, Barcelona
Country [64] 0 0
Spain
State/province [64] 0 0
Madrid
Country [65] 0 0
Spain
State/province [65] 0 0
Manises (Valencia)
Country [66] 0 0
Spain
State/province [66] 0 0
Sanlúcar De Barrameda (Cádiz)
Country [67] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [67] 0 0
Bradford
Country [68] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [68] 0 0
London
Country [69] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [69] 0 0
Sheffield
Country [70] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [70] 0 0
Swansea

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
GlaxoSmithKline
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
GSK Clinical Trials
Address 0 0
GlaxoSmithKline
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

Data sharing statement


What supporting documents are/will be available?

Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.


Additional trial details provided through ANZCTR
Accrual to date
Recruiting in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor
Commercial sector/Industry
Primary sponsor name
GlaxoSmithKline
Primary sponsor address
Primary sponsor country
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
 
Public notes
Investigators:
Nigel Toussaint, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Parkville, Australia, 3050
Peter Mount, Austin Health, Victoria, Heidelberg, Australia, 3084

Contacts
Principal investigator
Title 65 0
Name 65 0
Address 65 0
Country 65 0
Phone 65 0
Fax 65 0
Email 65 0
Contact person for public queries
Title 66 0
Name 66 0
Address 66 0
Country 66 0
Phone 66 0
Fax 66 0
Email 66 0
GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com
Contact person for scientific queries
Title 67 0
Name 67 0
Address 67 0
Country 67 0
Phone 67 0
Fax 67 0
Email 67 0
GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com