The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02353897




Registration number
NCT02353897
Ethics application status
Date submitted
29/01/2015
Date registered
3/02/2015
Date last updated
21/12/2018

Titles & IDs
Public title
Patient and Physician's Satisfaction After a Long Term Treatment of Glabellar Lines With Dysport®
Scientific title
An Assessment of Patient and Physician's Satisfaction After a Long Term Treatment of Glabellar Lines With Dysport®.
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
Y-79-52120-201
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
APPEAL
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Glabellar Lines 0 0
Condition category
Condition code

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Patient registry
Target follow-up duration
Target follow-up type
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
To assess patient satisfaction regarding GL after three injection cycles of Dysport. - Assessed by patient auto questionnaire completion
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Within 3 weeks ±7 days of visit 3
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
To describe patient individual expectations. - Assessed by patient auto questionnaire completion
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Within 3 weeks ±7 days of visit 1 and 2
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
To assess patient satisfaction after one and two injection cycles of Dysport. - Assessed by patient auto questionnaire completion
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Within 3 weeks ±7 days of visit 1 and 2
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
To describe factors associated with patient satisfaction such as attractiveness, self-esteem, self-perceived age, desire to receive another injection. - Assessed by patient auto questionnaire completion
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Within 3 weeks ±7 days of visit 1 and 2
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
To assess the GL severity (at rest and maximum frown) as per usual practice. - Physician assessment using GL severity scale
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Baseline (visit 1) and visit 3
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
To assess physician satisfaction after one and three injection cycles of Dysport. - 5 point Likert scale
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Visit 1 follow up visit and visit 3 follow up visit (if performed)
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
To describe Dysport injection practices: muscles injected, total injected units, total volume injected, number of injection points and interval between injections.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
From visit 1 until the end of the study

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Adult patient with moderate to severe GL naïve of any type of aesthetic
treatment/procedure (invasive and non-invasive) for GL who provided written informed
consent to take part.

- Patient who has prior to and independent of the study decided to undergo long term
treatment of GL only (at least three cycles).

- Patient able to comply with the protocol (completion of web questionnaires).

- Patient whom physician intended to treat with Dysport independent of participation in
the study.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Gender
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
- Patient already included in this study.

- Participation in an interventional trial within 30 days prior to study entry.

- Patient who is at risk in terms of precautions, warnings, and contraindication (follow
local Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) of Dysport).

- Female patient who is pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy during the study.

- Hypersensitivity to Dysport® or to its excipients.

- Presence of infection at the proposed injection sites.

- Presence of myasthenia gravis, Eaton Lambert syndrome or amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis.

Study design
Purpose
Duration
Selection
Timing
Prospective
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
SouthDerm - Sydney
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
ERASE - Victoria
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2217 - Sydney
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
3144 - Victoria
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [1] 0 0
Botucatu
Country [2] 0 0
Czechia
State/province [2] 0 0
Brno
Country [3] 0 0
Czechia
State/province [3] 0 0
Praha
Country [4] 0 0
Kazakhstan
State/province [4] 0 0
Almaty
Country [5] 0 0
Lebanon
State/province [5] 0 0
Beirut
Country [6] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [6] 0 0
Moscow
Country [7] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [7] 0 0
Novosibirsk
Country [8] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [8] 0 0
St Petersburg
Country [9] 0 0
Turkey
State/province [9] 0 0
Kocaeli
Country [10] 0 0
Ukraine
State/province [10] 0 0
Kyiv

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Name
Ipsen
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
This study aims to look at patient and physician satisfaction of long term Glabellar lines
(GL) treatment with Dysport in a real life setting. It will also allow better understanding
of what patients expect from the treatment, and the injection practices used by doctors.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02353897
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Ipsen Medical Director
Address 0 0
Ipsen
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

Summary results
Other publications